David, I am usually supportive of your ideas, but not in this case. Threatening to kill or do grievous bodily harm and similar activities inflicting or intending to inflict physical or property harm are criminal offences in Part 11 of the Crimes Act 1961. If need be, these provisions could be clarified to ensure online activities are covered. Beyond that, the remedy for people who claim to be affected is simple. Leave the platform. Don't participate.
The problem with your proposals is that, in the main, they are eminently both sensible and doable, hence none of the numpties in government will take any notice.
David, I am usually supportive of your ideas, but not in this case. Threatening to kill or do grievous bodily harm and similar activities inflicting or intending to inflict physical or property harm are criminal offences in Part 11 of the Crimes Act 1961. If need be, these provisions could be clarified to ensure online activities are covered. Beyond that, the remedy for people who claim to be affected is simple. Leave the platform. Don't participate.
Something for the Police Commissioner - might need to boost starting salaries and recruit nerds
The problem with your proposals is that, in the main, they are eminently both sensible and doable, hence none of the numpties in government will take any notice.
They want to keep the young people safe - but Chippy/Ardern mandated jabs for this age group. So it is obviously there is another agenda?
Did you see that part of what Erica is working on, is a digital ID for every internet user?